French file lawsuit against Louis Vuitton. They are fed up with the "big box"

A giant Louis Vuitton suitcase was installed on the Champs Elysees in Paris to highlight the brand's tradition and luxury. However, the installation caused controversy, and culture buffs and opponents of excessive commercialization decided to file a lawsuit demanding its removal.
In the heart of Paris , on one of the most prestigious stretches of the city – the Champs Elysées , the luxury giant LVMH decided to introduce a unique installation: a Louis Vuitton suitcase. Although it was supposed to be a symbol of the brand's heritage and tradition, its presence caused controversy . NGOs dealing with the protection of public spaces decided to file a lawsuit, considering the suitcase to be illegal advertising . The dispute became a symbol of a larger debate on the balance between the commercialization of public spaces and the protection of cultural and aesthetic values.

Since the fall of 2023, the building at 103-111 Avenue des Champs-Élysées , where the Louis Vuitton hotel is to be built, has been surrounded by a giant suitcase . The wood and steel structure refers to the history of the brand and its long tradition of producing luxury bags and luggage . The installation was intended to highlight the new store and hotel, and the Paris authorities considered it a " temporary advertisement " that was to be present until 2027. For environmentalists, however, the suitcase is an advertisement that goes beyond the permitted norms, especially in the case of historic buildings.
Paris comments on Louis Vuitton suitcase disputeThe city of Paris argues that the installation is legal because it does not meet the definition of traditional advertising – its purpose is to highlight the character of the new facility, not to directly promote products. In addition, LVMH paid a fee of 1.7 million euros to the city , which the authorities believe is sufficient compensation. However, for social activists - especially in the context of historic buildings, such interference in public space violates the principles of protecting cultural heritage.
@culted Fashion Week just got a whole lot more boujee (and expensive). Did you know that @Louis Vuitton is opening a 6000 square meter hotel on the Champs-Élysées? Set to open its doors in 2026, the luxury fashion maison continues to push into the hospitality sector, after the successful launch of an LV restaurant in St. Tropez last year. Until then, Paris is playing host to a monogram trunk facade which will cover the building works. Tres chic. 📸: @lucy.dimitrova #louisvuitton #trunk #hotel #paris #lv #hotel
♬ original sound - amro
Organizations such as SOS Paris and Résistance à l'Agression Publicitaire argue that this type of advertising violates the law. According to them, the Louis Vuitton suitcase is a form of advertising that aims to attract the attention of passers-by and tourists, and its presence on a historic building changes the aesthetic character of the urban space.
The decision of the Administrative Court may become a precedent that will set the rules for future large-format advertising, both in Paris and in other cities of exceptional cultural importance that will face similar challenges in the context of protecting monuments and public spaces.
Historic urban space vs. advertisingThe lawsuit against LV is just one part of a larger debate about the limits of commercialization of public space in cities of exceptional cultural value. Paris, a city with centuries of tradition, is at a crossroads between the need to adapt to contemporary market trends and the need to preserve its unique character.
well.pl