On-demand night transport and drone monitoring. GZM doesn't skimp.

Select Language

English

Down Icon

Select Country

Poland

Down Icon

Loading

What plans does GZM have in terms of electromobility and charging stations – both for public and private transport?

For private users, we've developed a map of electric vehicle charging stations, which is available on the InfoGZM website and is constantly updated. This is one of many maps available on our InfoGZM portal, which we use to present data.

In terms of public transport, we have significantly greater opportunities and are constantly investing in the development of an electric bus fleet and charging infrastructure. We recently secured over PLN 56 million in EU funds for the development of modern mobility.

The project involves, among other things, the purchase of eight new electric buses and four two-station plug-in chargers. Previously, we purchased eight hydrogen fuel cell buses , 18 electric buses, and nine two-station plug-in chargers under the GZM Hydrogen program, for which we received PLN 91 million in funding under the National Recovery Plan. In June, we also concluded a tender for the purchase of 31 buses with charging infrastructure as part of the GZM Green Transport project.

As you can see, we are using all possible means to purchase zero-emission vehicles.

Local government administration collects huge amounts of information every day.

Please tell us how Open Data is performing so far. In some cities, data sharing has led to abuses, but what about in GZM?

"In the era of modern cities, transparency and openness to citizens are crucial. Therefore, as part of a nearly two-year project, carried out jointly with PwC Polska and financed by the Polish Deal Government Program, we identified over 1,700 data sets. Of this pool, 446 have been made available on the GZM Open Data portal, and most of them are already updating automatically. We have not received any reports of related abuses. On the contrary, we are constantly receiving signals of how important and necessary this action is."

Every day, local governments collect vast amounts of information on key areas of residents' lives, such as education, ecology, access to culture, public transport, and spatial planning. Properly utilized and combined, this information can be a valuable source of knowledge, supporting more informed decisions regarding the provision of public services. Based on this information, businesses and non-governmental organizations can create tools to monitor the quality of these services and develop their own commercial solutions.

And it's happening. Today, the GZM Open Data portal provides a reliable source of data ready for reuse by local governments, analysts, NGOs, media, and businesses. As a result , GZM provides the largest number of datasets at level 5 of openness among all centers in Poland.

Is GZM planning to create a digital twin?

Creating a fully digital twin is a gigantic undertaking, requiring massive investments in technology, data collection, and analysis, especially when we're talking about an area encompassing 41 cities and municipalities. Of course, the potential benefits of Digital Twin solutions would be significant . That's why we want to test them too.

We are in talks with the Silesian University of Technology to test this technology within the Metrorower system, with the aim of relocating some rental stations to more "optimal" locations. Again, we plan to use maps and data generated by the Open Data and InfoGZM portals for this purpose.

Residents expect to be able to handle most official matters easily, quickly and without leaving home.

There's constant talk of transforming GZM into a megacity. This would also entail a massive administrative transformation. Is GZM considering implementing modern administrative systems?

When we think of a megacity, we imagine a strong organism with a political system similar to the capital city of Warsaw, where cities retain existing structures, such as mayors and city councils, but where some competencies, especially those requiring coordination, are transferred to a higher level . Such a solution would, on the one hand, allow cities to retain their own distinct identity, and on the other hand, ensure that residents' problems are addressed more effectively.

Of course, this transformation wouldn't be possible without the use of technology in government to streamline its operations and service delivery. Above all, it's about making life easier for residents of such a large urban entity – electronic communication, digitization of processes, and online access to services.

Residents expect, and I expect this myself, to be able to handle most official matters easily, quickly, and without leaving home. This is what modern times and our pace of life demand.

Technology is all about making life easier for residents (photo: shutterstock/Daniel Jedzura)
Technology is all about making life easier for residents (photo: shutterstock/Daniel Jedzura)

What are the biggest obstacles to implementing Smart City solutions in a metropolis?

"Implementing these types of solutions presents various obstacles. One of them may be financial issues and the fact that smart technologies seem expensive at first glance . However, when we look at the long-term benefits, we see that these investments pay off relatively quickly; not in the sense that they generate revenue, but rather that using new technologies is often simply cheaper than traditional forms of delivering a given service."

The biggest challenge today is no longer the technologies themselves—these are available and developing dynamically—but the organizational, legal, and institutional conditions for their implementation. A smart city is not just about purchasing the right system , but above all, integrating solutions within a complex, multi-stakeholder urban environment. In the case of a metropolis, where 41 municipalities of varying sizes, potential, and needs collaborate , coordinating activities and standardizing data and services becomes a key challenge . It's arduous work, but that's precisely our task.

In this sense, we can say that a metropolitan union is a smart solution in itself . We increasingly think of ourselves not as a specific structure or territory, but as an operating system that allows entities to effectively implement specific activities. We are no longer thinking of ourselves as maps. We want to see our boundaries not where city boundaries run, but where barriers or bottlenecks in solving problems arise.

Treating the metropolis as an "operating system" rather than another level of government means moving away from the traditional, bureaucratic thinking of the city as an official structure in favor of a functional and dynamic approach. In this view , the metropolis is not merely a structure of territorial authority, but a platform that integrates and coordinates the various flows that define modern urban life. Just as an operating system ensures that applications work together, the metropolis should ensure that the activities of individual municipalities, institutions, and sectors are synchronized.

Don't miss the most important news. Follow us on Google News.
Share
portalsamorzadowy

portalsamorzadowy

Similar News

All News
Animated ArrowAnimated ArrowAnimated Arrow