They propose that the US return California to us so it doesn't have to deal with the protests.

San Andreas Fault in Mexico.- Faced with a growing wave of protests, marches, and urban bonfires, it has been proposed that the United States return California to Mexico.

The proposal was launched by the UN General Council itself, after witnessing the chaos of recent days in several Californian cities, a situation that has unhinged the Donald Trump administration.

Border?? 😂 Research a little before making a foooool out of yourself. 🤡

All of present-day California once belonged to Mexico, before becoming independent, it was part of New Spain. pic.twitter.com/jHXepUZbdC

— 2ChikyM (@mchyky18) June 10, 2025

California would return but without Disneyland

"So that they no longer suffer, all they need to do is return the territory to its rightful owner," the organization's secretary general declared diplomatically.

The plan, already circulating on social media under the hashtag #DevueltonCalifornia , calls for the United States to divest itself of the entity in order to focus on other national problems, such as ballistic practices in high schools , the price of eggs, or the excessive use of the three-point shot in the NBA.

🚨BREAKING: US Marines have been spotted on the streets of Los Angeles

It's time to liberate America. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/oaZwU9c6Dx

— Inevitable West (@Inevitablewest) June 10, 2025

"We're evaluating the idea, but we think we'll have to rethink what would happen to Disneyland and Napa Valley," the White House spokesperson said after the proposal was announced.

Meanwhile, in California , the news has generated mixed reactions. Some residents think it's a hoax, while others are excited about the prospect of finally eating decent food and tasting sauces with real flavor.

And just in case you missed it: People who bought the Switch 2 are reporting that the screen came with staple marks.

Important: Remember that El Deforma is a site for entertainment, humor, and satire. The content in our articles should NOT be taken as a real source of information, even if some elements of the article are true. The only section where the content is 100% real is the "Unbelievable but True" section.