Pd and Avs want every citizen to love whoever they want. Except those who don't vote for them

On the same topic:

On the famous Bocconi survey about children who get engaged to people who vote for parties other than their parents'. The fact that this is unacceptable for almost 80 percent of supporters of the Green-Left Alliance and for over 60 percent of supporters of the Democratic Party, and the fact that the event is instead substantially indifferent in the eyes of voters of the League and Forza Italia (just over 20 percent), are two sides of the same coin. It means that, for those who call themselves left-wing, politics must also have to do with private life; while, for those who call themselves right-wing, private life must be safeguarded by politics . It means that, for those who call themselves left-wing, politics must have an educational value that is passed down from generation to generation; while, for those who call themselves right-wing, that everyone must do what they want. Everyone chooses their side, in this opposition that seems more anthropological than ideological.

I, who am right-wing for duties and left-wing for rights, can nevertheless point out this to you: those who most strenuously oppose the idea of ​​a child dating someone who thinks differently are precisely those parties that in the past decades have spent most in favor of the affirmation that love is love and that in its name, as long as he is happy, a person can do anything . It is curious how those same parents, who rightly believe they are guaranteeing support to a child who is engaged even with a bedside table or a giraffe, turn up their noses and veto when he brings home a boyfriend who wants the flat tax or the return of Latin to middle school. Pd and Avs are the parties that want every citizen to be happy: but happy as they want, not as he wants .

More on these topics: